Ayşegül Savaş on the Mystery of Pregnancy

This week’s story, Sacred Conception, tells the story of a woman who discovers she is pregnant. This is amazing. She imagines the face of her Madonna in her Annunciation scene and understands the mystery of her gaze anew. Do you think she is near euphoria?

I wanted to examine all the intangible elements that accompany pregnancy, the various superstitions, the sacred and secret halos that result from them.

The narrator feels that the discovery of her pregnancy has changed something, but what exactly? Although she looks all the same on the outside, she has entered a new state. Her experience is probably also cut short by the fact that if she is euphoric, she will try to clarify it.

She goes to a party and while drinking non-alcoholic beer, a man starts teasing her. He becomes the first person she speaks to, jokingly asking if she belongs to the Greek school or the American school, and whether to keep the news to herself or share. Do not mention or become pregnant. What made you want to introduce that idea here?

Structurally, the conversation foreshadows what is to come. However, it is also the first of many beliefs surrounding pregnancy that the narrator encounters throughout the story. A lot of the stories are about this dichotomy. A mystery that cannot be named and our attempt to codify it in language and superstition.

The narrator has a friend Zoe who was once very close. They recently rekindled their friendship and it turns out Zoe is pregnant. She feels a greater bond with Zoe than with the father of the baby she has yet to speak to. Why do you think so?

The narrator’s attitude towards her pregnancy is more ritualistic than practical. She wants to maintain a sense of wonder rather than make her concrete plans, she wants to be close to other women, Zoe and her mother. Because they believe they understand their condition better than the baby’s father. At the same time, she has a self-centered, almost self-centered attitude. She shares her news with Zoe to indulge in these emotions. is meant to emphasize its mystery, but misses the point, perhaps because it’s so unmysterious. It has to do with contemporary culture, the way the sacred and the body have been commoditized in New Age discourse.

It becomes clear that the narrator begins to bleed and is missing the baby. In her story, she uses the word “it” when she first refers to her pregnancy and the beginning of her miscarriage.

Yes, these states transcend language, and their articulations strip them of their essence. Later in the story, the narrator says that the physical pain of a miscarriage freed her from the need to give it meaning. are more sacred than attempts to enshrine the states of , and they cannot be integrated into the ‘flat dimension’ of everyday life.

As the narrator’s pregnancy comes to an end, Zoe is celebrating her pregnancy. Be more generous and trust me to hear from her soon. How do you think readers will react? Do you think they understand Zoe’s silence, or do you judge for the narrator?

i wonder about that.zoe is doing nothing clearly error.After all, she sends the narrator some sort of message, and at the end of the story, the narrator is sure that Zoe will get in touch soon and suggest an appropriate conversation. don’t care about reaction enoughZoe is so preoccupied with her own happy state that, at least soon, she can make room for the suffering of others. I don’t think you can. might say something that sounds sensible. She is happy for herself before she takes care of the people around her. But these justifications aren’t all that different from how Zoe and the narrator talked about pregnancy just a few weeks ago, giving a name to a special condition and trying to turn it into some sort of achievement.

Does the sense of understanding this other world and its depth stay with the narrator?

I think so. At the same time, I think she remembers it differently than how she discussed it with Zoe and her attempts to capture its misty essence. As for the relationship, which is also composed of language, the reader understands that the narrator has changed, but does not know what it means. ♦

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *