Meghan Markle is heavily pregnant in Frogmore Cottage in previously unseen snaps

Meghan Markle got a glimpse into the last months of her first pregnancy with son Archie in early 2019.

Two unpublished black-and-white photographs of the pregnant Duchess of Sussex at the couple’s Frogmore Cottage in Windsor.

In one snap, Meghan looked out her window, hands propping her up against a striking baby bump.

The first three episodes of Harry and Meghan (part of Sussex’s multi-million dollar deal with Netflix) streamed last week, with the final three-hour episode starting today.

Meghan Markle got a glimpse into the last months of her first pregnancy with son Archie in early 2019

The snaps were apparently taken during the last trimester of her first pregnancy and show Meghan enjoying the moment away from the spotlight.

The first snap shows Meghan looking out the window in a form-fitting pregnancy dress in one of her cottage rooms.

In the other photo, she’s walking in a garden in a polka-dotted dress and coat, with her hair tied up in a loose ponytail.

Her dog Guy can be seen roaming next to her with one of the couple’s other puppies, and the expectant mother holds a leash in her hand.

The second photo shows her walking in a garden in a polka-dotted dress and coat, with her hair tied in a loose ponytail.

The second photo shows her walking in a garden in a polka-dotted dress and coat, with her hair tied in a loose ponytail.

The Sussexes six-part show – part of a multi-million-pound deal with Netflix – debuts at Premiere Week as streaming giant’s most-watched documentary, with 81.55 million hours watched Did.

While the first tranche covered the courtship and romance of the couple, many were deeply displeased with the program’s all-out attack on the late Queen’s Commonwealth legacy.

Harry also ripped his family apart, especially his father and brother, with a series of sly bargains, including the suggestion that he married a woman who fit the “type,” not for love.

The Duke also said members of his family questioned why Meghan needed more protection from the media than his wife did, but they didn’t understand the “racial element.”

Claims made in yesterday’s trailer were quickly declared “nonsense” by royal experts, but one commentator said the series is clearly “a form of revenge.”

In one clip, Meghan’s UK privacy attorney, Jenny Affia, revealed that Lucy Fraser, whose real name is Lucy Meadmore, was a mystery until a week ago. became this scapegoat, claiming to have seen evidence of a conspiracy against the Duchess before saying “for the palace”.

The Duchess herself also suggested that she was made a scapegoat, adding: A story about someone in the family popped out for a moment and they said,

But the Daily Mail’s royal editor Rebecca English said last night that only people who “have no media ignorance” will avoid talking about members of the royal family in exchange for derogatory talk about Meghan and Harry. He said he would.

In an email, she said, “I hadn’t heard a negative word” about Sussex until at least six months after we were married.

In fact, Ms English believed her aide did everything she could to keep up appearances when “everything seemed to be going wrong” within the Sussex household.

She added: “Staff insisted they were leaving for personal reasons or because they had exciting new opportunities to pursue. It’s not Meghan’s fault in any way.

“I was told with a straight face that it was just a ‘security incident’, even when I personally witnessed her circle the team members and shed tears of humiliation.

“I had a stand-up dispute with the Palace staff when I suggested they were dealing with the truth economically. I was filled with an open sigh of dissatisfaction.”

She also said that Harry’s “flatly rude and unprofessional behavior” was left out of her copy because 38-year-old Harry’s “impressive philanthropy deserves the star of the show.”

“The truth is that the negative stories about Harry and Meghan only started coming out when their behavior became so offensive that it became impossible to hide.

“That’s not what I expect you to hear when today’s dramatic finale lands on Netflix.

Calls piled up overnight to confirm evidence for a highly damaging claim, with one royal family source declaring:

Royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams also called on the filmmakers to back up the claims.

In response to the trailer released yesterday, Fitzwilliams told MailOnline that it shows “how great this documentary series is for Netflix.”

“The claim is that the palace has used Meghan Markle as a ‘scapegoat’ so other harmful stories about other royals disappear.

“The question is which royals benefited and who knew about it. What other members of the royal family were involved, or were courtiers briefings without their knowledge?

William was named in an earlier trailer by Harry.

“What exactly is the evidence to support their claim that Meghan was fed by wolves?

“Essentially the allegation is that the agency opposed them and used the media to discredit them with a barrage of negative articles. I say, but what is the evidence?”

He added: “This is definitely a form of revenge. It remains to be seen if and how the royals will react after the series airs tomorrow.

read more:

The suggestion that negative stories were “fed” to the media by the Palace as part of the “war” against Meghan is simply not true.

Harry and Meghan Netflix documentary LIVE: final three episodes released today find Duchess branded ‘scapegoat’ in preparation for new royal offense

Steven Glover: The world is tired of shallow and selfish Sussex.The monarchy will still last when their groans are long forgotten

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *